The court docket upheld the decisions of The 2 lower courts, which had rightly disbelieved the statements from the plaintiff’s witnesses concerning the proof from the alleged oral reward. The absence of considerable proof to support the declare of an oral gift led into the dismissal on the petitioner’s case. https://land-ownership-and-title60591.fare-blog.com/31270276/title-and-ownership-wakeel-in-karachi-for-dummies